How real businesses use Mesta.

Wiremit is a fast-growing fintech and cross-border payments platform serving merchants and consumers across the UK, Europe and Africa. Originally established as a diaspora-focused remittance provider, it is evolving into a comprehensive pan-African financial services platform supporting businesses that collect payments, manage treasury and make international payouts.

As Wiremit expanded into larger B2B payment flows, it required infrastructure capable of supporting both fiat-to-stablecoin treasury operations and stablecoin-to-fiat beneficiary payouts, while maintaining enterprise-grade compliance and operational reliability.

Managing these flows through multiple providers would increase operational complexity, reconciliation effort and compliance overhead — so Wiremit required a single partner spanning the complete payment lifecycle.

Mandioca is a leading fintech platform and trade aggregator serving several hundred enterprises across Latin America — facilitating hundreds of millions of dollars in trade between LATAM and Asia, with a particularly strong presence in the Colombia–China corridor.

Many of its customers maintain a significant portion of working capital in stablecoins to reduce exposure to local currency volatility while preserving liquidity for international trade. These businesses regularly transact with suppliers across China, Hong Kong, and Singapore, where commercial settlements are predominantly conducted in U.S. dollars.

As trade volumes grew, Mandioca sought a payment infrastructure capable of supporting both blockchain-native treasury operations and traditional international banking rails within a single operating model.

Managing these movements required multiple providers, fragmented operational processes, and lengthy customer onboarding — creating unnecessary complexity as Mandioca expanded its trade network.

Copperx — building a stablecoin-based neobank — faced operational drag from traditional payment providers that were slow, expensive, and unreliable.

Legacy rails caused 1–3 business-day settlement, high fees, and inadequate support, putting strain on operations and customer trust.

Latin American remittance flows demanded near-instant settlement, low cost, and consistent uptime — capabilities legacy correspondent banking could not deliver.